On Sunday, September 01, 2013 18:23:15 Raman Gupta wrote: > On 08/31/2013 03:27 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Saturday, August 31, 2013 13:01:45 Raman Gupta wrote: > >> The mail from domain name in the body of the message differs from the > >> HELO/server hostname. But again, the HELO/server hostname is a valid > >> SPF sender, based on an SPF "a" directive. > >> > >> But DMARC imposes an additional requirement for identity alignment before > >> it will use the SPF result. > > But this would imply that my mail server should be configured to send > "HELO mydomain.com" instead of "HELO mail.mydomain.com" where "mail" > is the hostname of the mail server. > > The default value for HELO/EHLO in Postfix is $myhostname, not > $mydomain, and I believe most other mail servers send hostname as well. > > It seems to me the DMARC spec should take into account that, for empty > Return-Path's, the HELO/EHLO may be (and probably will be) a fully > qualified hostname, not a domain, and adjust the rules for SPF > identity alignment matching accordingly.
I think it does, as long as the hostname is a subdomain of the From domain. You'll need to at least have that. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
