Am 09.09.2013 09:11 schrieb Olga Gavrylyako:
> "Bad format" means that you are not following DKIM RFC spec.
ups, just sign using opendkim ...
and validation with opendkim give "pass"
Sep 9 21:32:21 main opendkim[10758]: 36F376F4484: DKIM-Signature field added
(s=default, d=dnswl.org)
Sep 9 21:36:21 main postfix/smtp[7360]: 36F376F4484: to=<sca at
andreasschulze.de>,
relay=mx.andreasschulze.de[2001:a60:f0b4:e500::f43e:4ea2]:25, delay=240,
delays=235/0/0.86/3.8, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
3cYfkT4nNmz259N)
Sep 9 21:36:17 taro postfix/smtpd[13738]: 3cYfkT4nNmz259N:
client=main.dnswl.org[2a01:4f8:131:3e1::4]
Sep 9 21:36:18 taro opendkim[11617]: 3cYfkT4nNmz259N: DKIM verification
successful
Sep 9 21:36:18 taro opendkim[11617]: 3cYfkT4nNmz259N: s=default d=dnswl.org
SSL
Sep 9 21:36:18 taro opendmarc[27472]: 3cYfkT4nNmz259N: dnswl.org pass
Authentication-Results: taro; dmarc=pass
header.from=dnswl.org
Authentication-Results: taro;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=dnswl.org
[email protected] header.b=rs60/suT;
dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral
> If you share full message headers with me, I could take a look. But
> generally I do not see any messages from dnswl.org, which pass DKIM
> validation.
I send you further messages offlist.
> Olga
Andreas
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
