Tim, im very happy for your reply.
Any email sent from the server is marked as spam by Gmail and inserted into the appropriate folder. I am puzzled. The IP is not entered any blacklists I assume it's a problem of SPF records You would need more details? Best regards, Paolo. Inviato: martedì 10 settembre 2013 17:29 A: Netsons > Paolo Giustiniani Cc: [email protected] Oggetto: Re: [dmarc-discuss] About SPAM Policy Hi Paolo, can you describe the problem? What were you expecting to happen? =- Tim On Sep 10, 2013, at 11:18 AM, "Netsons > Paolo Giustiniani" <[email protected]> wrote: Hello, i have a problem with Gmail filter spam and other. This is the source Delivered-To: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Received: by 10.194.249.3 with SMTP id yq3csp37474wjc; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:49:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.93.104 with SMTP id ct8mr13531556wib.0.1378824596007; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> Received: from <http://hosting.webself.it> hosting.webself.it ( <http://hosting.webself.it> hosting.webself.it. [95.141.39.246]) by <http://mx.google.com> mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hk7si7197472wjb.15.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral ( <http://google.com> google.com: 95.141.39.246 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]) client-ip=95.141.39.246; Authentication-Results: <http://mx.google.com> mx.google.com; spf=neutral ( <http://google.com> google.com: 95.141.39.246 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]) <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Received: from host131-71-static. <http://224-95-b.business.telecomitalia.it> 224-95-b.business.telecomitalia.it ([95.224.71.131]:60302 helo=KiRHP) by <http://hosting.webself.it> hosting.webself.it with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]>) id 1VJPAp-0006Gy-Vx for <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:44:12 +0400 Message-ID: <2ABCC8B9004D401690CFD00558AA113B@KiRHP> From: "Riccardo Pirrone - KiRweb" < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> To: < <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> Subject: prova Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:49:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_036C_01CEAE45.C29E8C30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - <http://hosting.webself.it> hosting.webself.it X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - <http://gmail.com> gmail.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - <http://kirweb.it> kirweb.it X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: <http://hosting.webself.it> hosting.webself.it: authenticated_id: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. How can solve this problem? _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] <http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms ( <http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html> http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) -- Tim Draegen | Principal | Eudaemonic Development, LLC [email protected] | tdraegen@{aim,gmail,skype,yahoo} | Mobile: (831) 227-8002
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
