John Coutts <[email protected]> wrote: >A review of our DNS logs yesterday revealed a number of requests for >DMARC records, followed by a great many requests for type 99 records >which our DNS server does not support. RFC 4408 dated September 2013 >clearly states: > > Studies have shown that RRTYPE 99 has not seen any substantial use, > and in fact its existence and mechanism defined in [RFC4408] has led > to some interoperability issues. Accordingly, its use is now > obsolete, and new implementations are not to use it. > >Do the DMARC specs reflect this information?
DMARC only consumes the result of the SPF check. It doesn't have anything to say about how it's done. The internet draft you are quoting is IESG approved, but isn't an RFC yet. RFC 4408 was published in 2005. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
