Which draft is that? On 12/10/13 11:39 AM, "John Levine" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Suggest following this thread from 2007. >>http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2007q2/007663.html > >That's the null MX proposal. I resuscitated Mark Delany's draft in >July, and I suppose I might nudge Murray to see if appsawg would >accept it, but it's a separate issue. > >For DMARC, what advice can we offer beyond publishing SPF -al and DKIM >p=reject? (Normally I'm not a big fan of p=reject, but this is a >place where it's clearly appropriate.) > >R's, >John >_______________________________________________ >dmarc-discuss mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > >NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
