I suspect this might be best asked on the opendmarc list ([email protected]) since it's product-specific.
-MSK On 12/20/13 9:26 AM, "Andreas Tauscher" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hello list! > >As far I understood the docs OpenDMARC relies in the headers about DKIM >and SPF verification added. > >Here now starts my problem: >I'm running amavis as a pre-queue proxy filter for incoming mails. IMHO >the only way to do spam check. Anything else is making an spam filter >obsolete. Especially for business mails. If I have to check the spam >folder for false positives, I can dump this also in the inbox, and then >I don't need an spam filter any more. Postscreen, greylisting and >policyd-weight is enough. Rejecting, and the sender knows here was a >problem. Every spam I reject is no cash the m....fu...s sending spam. >They are paid per delivered mail. > >But with a proxy filter the DMARC milter is not working because the >headers are still missing. > >Is a implementation as policy service wip? >Or should I send then all incoming mails to a second instance of postfix >which would then have the needed headers. Anybody tried this already or >is here a big bug in my plan? > >Andreas >_______________________________________________ >dmarc-discuss mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > >NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
