On Jan 7, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > this could reduce reporting for pass to limit abuse problems, here i get > tired of domains that want reports, but defer forever in there mailserver > > could this be changed without breaking dmarc ?
You're doing them a favor by sending reports, right? You have no obligation to deliver reports, especially not if they're being a well behaved recipient. I noticed I had a collection of messages that weren't able to be delivered, so I updated Mail::DMARC to automatically handle them sensibly: Author: Matt Simerson <[email protected]> Date: Fri Sep 6 14:27:10 2013 -0700 v1.20130906 - delete reports that return a SMTP 5XX code for the recipient - delete reports after encountering 12 delivery errors I think it's sensible to let this be an implementation choice. > currently i also see more then one ruf and rua, well its ok, but i think its > abuse :( It makes no difference to me. I attempt to deliver to every address listed and if any one succeeds, then I consider the report delivered. Matt _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
