Hi, all,
I wonder whether others have noticed this as well: there are two
domains: domainA and domainB
1) for domainA the report receiver domain is equal to the domain for
which the dmarc policy is published (e.g. mailto:someone@domainA),
2) for domainB, the report receiver domain name is of a 3rd party
receiving the reports (on behalf of one of their customers, see section
7.1 of the spec), e.g. mailto:someone@domainC
It appears that Google and xs4all.nl send aggregate reports for both 1)
and 2) but from Hotmail, aggregate reports are only received for 1)
(domainA), not for 2) (domainB). Now I wonder:
- did microsoft not implement the logic of par. 7.1 for their sending
reports?
- how many of the aggregate report senders implement the logic of 7.1?
If Microsoft did not implement it (?), how many others did not implement it?
And yes, I'm sure there was (some) traffic to hotmail.com addresses
which should have been part of an aggregate report, if that had been sent.
What is your experience re. support for 3rd party report receiver domains?
/rolf
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
