On May 10, 2014, at 2:29 AM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Oh, wow. The mail going into the archive isn't the same as the mail >>> going out to the list. I wonder what we'll "fix" next. >> >> This feels like complaining for complaining's sake. Do you prefer that >> the from address in the archive be similarly modified, or do you prefer >> to limit the modification to only exactly when necessary? > > I prefer that the archive be an archive of the actual list. That > doesn't seem particularly exotic. > Please open a bug with mailman, they did not feel it the same way as you...
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
