I think you can configure that globally in php.ini
 On May 31, 2014 12:37 PM, "Tomasz Chmielewski via dmarc-discuss" <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for clarification.
>
> Sounds like it may be problematic for web applications using PHP mail()
> or similar (which defaults to using username@server for Return-Path
> rather than adjusting it with From, and rarely give the option to
> override it).
>
> Anyway, fixed for me - thanks!
>
>
> --
> Tomasz Chmielewski
> http://www.sslrack.com
>
>
> On Fri, 30 May 2014 20:45:37 -0700
> Andrew Flury <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> > As Tim suspected, these reports indicate an SPF alignment problem.
> > Hotmail is reporting that it’s doing SPF checks using
> > web2.virtall.com as the authority domain (typically the MAIL FROM /
> > envelope domain, but it could be the HELO/EHLO domain in the case of
> > bounces).  Emails sent with From: header domains of ptraveler.com
> > need to use MAIL FROM domains (and HELO/EHLO domains for bounces) of
> > ptraveler.com or one of its subdomains in order to pass SPF from
> > DMARC’s perspective.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > On May 30, 2014, at 17:21 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski via dmarc-discuss
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've attached a few XML reports.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tomasz Chmielewski
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 30 May 2014 20:02:31 -0400
> > > Tim Draegen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Tomasz, can you share the rest of the xml "record"?  Cant tell if
> > >> there is an alignment issue or not without that.
> > >>
> > >> =- Tim
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> On May 30, 2014, at 7:29 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski via dmarc-discuss
> > >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> 178.63.195.102 is allowed in SPF:
> > >>>
> > >>> # dig +short TXT ptraveler.com
> > >>> "v=spf1 a mx ip4:178.63.195.102 ip6:2a01:4f8:120:22eb::1111
> > >>> ip4:46.4.130.2 ~all" "spf2.0/pra a mx ip4:178.63.195.102
> > >>> ip6:2a01:4f8:120:22eb::1111 ip4:46.4.130.2 ~all"
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> And yet, hotmail sends:
> > >>>
> > >>> <row>
> > >>> <source_ip>178.63.195.102</source_ip>
> > >>> <count>1</count>
> > >>> <policy_evaluated>
> > >>> <disposition>none</disposition>
> > >>> <dkim>fail</dkim>
> > >>> <spf>fail</spf>
> > >>> </policy_evaluated>
> > >>> </row>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Tomasz Chmielewski
> > >>> http://www.sslrack.com
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
> > >>>
> > >>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note
> > >>> Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
> > >
> > > <google.com!ptraveler.com!1401062400!1401148799.xml><hotmail.com!
> ptraveler.com!1401058800!1401145200.xml><hotmail.com!ptraveler.com
> !1401318000!1401404400.xml><yahoo.com!ptraveler.com
> !1401062400!1401148799.xml>_______________________________________________
> > > dmarc-discuss mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
> > >
> > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note
> > > Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to