On Saturday, June 07, 2014 17:00:25 Dave Crocker wrote: > On 6/7/2014 4:56 PM, Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss wrote: > > If only DMARC had a mechanism for providing feedback so that people > > could measure this and provide data. ;-) > > I'm pretty sure it isn't my jet lag that's causing me to miss the rest > of the details. For the question just posed -- make lists harder to use > for all users of lists -- how can DMARC reporting develop the necessary > data?
Maybe I lost context, but I thought the claim that was being disputed and needed assessment was if p=reject was affecting the rate of phishing attempts. It would seem to me that for that question, a comparison of before/after p=reject data would yield some interesting information. For that question, I agree and sorry for the noise. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
