I'd like to highlight this as an example of what I think is a great value in 
this list.  The ability of operators to have an open dialog about their mail 
operations and how it impacts interoperability is a wonderful thing.  I wish 
there was more of it.

Scott K

On Wednesday, August 06, 2014 17:58:50 Rock, Paul via dmarc-discuss wrote:
> So I checked, we do support it, we just don't announce it as part of the
> ehlo response, which of course means that no one knows we support it. I
> know we had some legacy reasons for disabling 8BITMIME and a few other
> things in our ehlo response, but I'll ask to see if we can turn them back
> on.
> 
> PAUL ROCK
> Senior Programmer/Analyst | AOL Mail
> P: 703-265-5734 | C: 703-980-8380
> AIM: paulsrock
> 44900 Prentice Dr. | Dulles, VA | 20166-9305
> 
> On Aug 6, 2014, at 10:21 AM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-
[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > yesterday I noted that a testmessage to an aol.de account was delivered to
> > the spam-folder @AOL. I guess dkim=fail for that message was the reason.
> > 
> > Some testmessages later i found AOL does not announce the 8BITMIME smtp
> > extension. My outbound mta has to recode the content and break the
> > already existing signature.
> > 
> > * is there a reason AOL does not support 8BITMIME?
> > 
> >  RFC1426 is 20 years old and updated by RFC6152 in 2011
> > 
> > How do other handle that situation?
> > Do that recoding also break some opaque S/MIME signatures?
> > 
> > I'm confused...
> > 
> > Andreas
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmarc-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
> > 
> > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to