>I understand you may not have budgeted upgrades, ... You know, it's kind of Orwellian to redefine "upgrade" to mean "ugly hack to work around damage caused by outsourcing the costs of security problems of large entities with enormous market power."
Really, we understand why some providers weighed the costs and decided to do something that shafted mailing lists and a bunch of other mail operators. But it would make the conversation a lot more honest and productive if you admitted it, rather than trying to pretend that decades of productive mail usage somehow became wrong because DMARC doesn't happen to be able to describe it. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
