Inline signatures?

Alec

On Oct 6, 2014, at 11:32, Murray Kucherawy via dmarc-discuss 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I get Received:, but why would Content-Length change in-flight?

-MSK

On 10/6/14, 11:01 AM, "Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

With obvious implications for DMARC failures.  See the postfix-users
thread
that starts here:

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://archives.neohapsis.com/a
rchives/postfix/2014-10/0138.html&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=aZ0x
RzXh0AB20HBCmRph%2Bg%3D%3D%0A&m=lfSYBVH5FDF6rosyLcdxRtbHZp5ZSdRNYpI%2FRX5G
Km4%3D%0A&s=4200de29230600b9387daa6a9396f6c078fbb8a0011afc5ff99f437e767fab
f8

It would be helpful if Yahoo! were to dial this back a bit and stick with
the
recommended fields to sign (i.e. drop Received and Content-Length).
Signing
those fields inevitably makes the signatures more fragile.

Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/li
stinfo/dmarc-discuss&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=aZ0xRzXh0AB20HBCm
Rph%2Bg%3D%3D%0A&m=lfSYBVH5FDF6rosyLcdxRtbHZp5ZSdRNYpI%2FRX5GKm4%3D%0A&s=b
088a07c4fdc10672e30bf29d947b642af222cb0345354759deb4bc760cc36f1

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
terms
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.dmarc.org/note_well
.html&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=aZ0xRzXh0AB20HBCmRph%2Bg%3D%3D%0
A&m=lfSYBVH5FDF6rosyLcdxRtbHZp5ZSdRNYpI%2FRX5GKm4%3D%0A&s=4b0dcd065be5e034
bb0d6fcf9943fd5db1904b0adf73313b58891bb54979af11)


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

ALEC H PETERSON
cto
tel +1 443 656 3322
twitter @ahpeterson
email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to