On Friday, January 16, 2015 18:45:32 Benny Pedersen via dmarc-discuss wrote: > On 16. jan. 2015 10.23.10 Constantino Antunes via dmarc-discuss > <[email protected]> wrote > > > Since yesterday I made the following changes: > > - changed the rua address: the previous one was receiving e-mail, but > > nevertheless > > - found an old SPF rule which was too permissive: did a complete rewrite > > of > > the SPF record > > and note to users of libspf2, it checks sender-id, and thus opendmarc see > then sender-id as a spf-fail or spf-pass, so do not use libspf2 in > opendmarc, keep this in mind when checking reports
This is, to be nice about it, nonsense. There may be an issue with libspf2 integration with opendmarc, but it doesn't "check sender-id". Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
