Scott, send me an example of the message with full headers, we will work it out.
Четверг, 05 марта 2015, 12:33 -05:00 от Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]>: >I've been reviewing some DMARC failures reported in data from mail.ru. > >In this case the From domain is a subdomain of the main company domain (e.g. >sub.example.com), the DKIM signature is d= the main company domain (e.g. >example.com), and the DMARC record is the org domain record as well (e.g. >_dmarc.example.com). The feedback is that the raw DKIM signature is valid, >but not aligned. Reports from other providers, e.g. Google, use the signature >for DMARC pass. > >It seems like perhaps mail.ru is looking for strict DKIM identity alignment >even though relaxed is the default (and the DMARC record in question doesn't >specify adkim). > >Does anyone have a contact there that they can raise the issue? > >Scott K >_______________________________________________ >dmarc-discuss mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > >NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms >( http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html ) -- Vladimir Dubrovin QA Service manager @mail.ru
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
