May be, you have two DKIM-Signature fields in the message for some
cases, e.g. redirected/auto-forwarded messages?

The Venus Project via dmarc-discuss пишет:
> Hi,
> 
> I see something strange in the DMARC reports that we're getting from
> Google. Here is the relevant section from the XML file:
> 
>  <record>
>     <row>
>       <source_ip>109.73.224.155</source_ip>
>       <count>10</count>
>       <policy_evaluated>
>         <disposition>none</disposition>
>         <dkim>pass</dkim>
>         <spf>pass</spf>
>       </policy_evaluated>
>     </row>
>     <identifiers>
>       <header_from>thevenusproject.com</header_from>
>     </identifiers>
>     <auth_results>
>       <dkim>
>         <domain>thevenusproject.com</domain>
>         <result>pass</result>
>       </dkim>
>       <dkim>
>         <domain>thevenusproject.com</domain>
>         <result>fail</result>
>       </dkim>
>       <spf>
>         <domain>thevenusproject.com</domain>
>         <result>pass</result>
>       </spf>
>     </auth_results>
>   </record>
> 
> 
> 
> As you can see, it seems to check DKIM two times - one time it passes
> and one time it fails. I am kinda baffled by this. There is only one
> DKIM section in the reports that we're getting from Microsoft and Yahoo.
> Also, we have only one DKIM DNS record set up for thevenusproject.com.
> 
> Does anyone have any idea why this double checking of DKIM (with
> different results) is happening with Google?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Borislav
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
> 
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)


-- 
Владимир Дубровин
Руководитель службы тестирования
@Mail.Ru
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to