>which do not deploy DMARC yet, on the other hand. A possible explanation >can be that the majority of these providers and organizations are too >small to afford one or more full time staff for their mail >administration.
Another possibility is that since they are small, they do not have the problems that DMARC is intended to solve, so why bother? > So a draft like John's draft-levine-dkim-conditional may >fit the big ESP scene, but the vast majority of sending domains won't >have a clue on when to add the !fs signature and when not, as they >simply have no information about their users on who's on which list. As I think I've said about a dozen times, most small senders could put a conditional signature on everything, since the risk of enabling a lot of spam that way is low. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
