On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:51 PM, John R Levine via dmarc-discuss <[email protected]> wrote: >> It is even worse than I thought, you really want to stop efforts in >> fighting phish, by muddling the waters between real domains and fake ones > > > There's no muddling going on. dmarc.fail is a real domain that should have > an excellent reputation since it sends no phish.
I think Franck is right. It is muddying the waters by introducing a wholly other domain that has nothing to do with the list or the subscriber. Not seeing why anybody would recommend that as a best practice. -- Al Iverson - Minneapolis - (312) 275-0130 Simple DNS Tools since 2008: xnnd.com www.spamresource.com & aliverson.com _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
