John Levine wrote: >>I'd prefer: >> >> From: Foo list [Jane Smith] <f...@list.org> >> CC: Jane Smith <j...@smith.org> > > Given that most MUAs these days don't show the e-mail address > at all, it's hard to see why that would be better.
Granted, it's a fine point. >> 1: Reply-To: appears to have become a third rail, I won't touch it. > > Oh, it's been a point of religious controversy for at least 20 years. > I wouldn't touch it either, other than to note that adding a reply-to > as a workaround to From: header workarounds rarely works the way > you expect it to. Quite. - Roland _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
