On your incoming mail system, send the failure reports. You will see what systems your employees are using outside of your perimeter (because they always email themselves too). This is usually enough to debug things.
Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question. > On Dec 14, 2016, at 14:15, John Comfort via dmarc-discuss > <[email protected]> wrote: > > As a result of mail receivers not sending forensic reports, the amount of > time to migrate to a reject policy can increase considerably. It would be a > nice option within the DMARC RFC to specify a new switch indicating the > desire to receive header-only forensic reports. The expectation being that > all mail receivers would be willing to send these snipped reports. This > would negate the concerns of privacy (because the body of the message is not > sent), and negate the concerns of shipping large email body data back to a > forensic URI. > > (e.g. fh=0, default; fh=1 header only) > > Any comments on this? > > Thank you, > > John > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms > (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
