On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Steven M Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/05/2017 17:32, Jim Popovitch via dmarc-discuss wrote: >> I've been trying, albeit slowly, to determine why I haven't seen any >> RUF reports since Sept 2016. >> >> Shouldn't this RUA report also produce a corresponding RUF? > > Are you DKIM signing these messages?
No. The msg is presumably spam sent by 171.40.246.96 (an IP I don't have any access to) using a domain that I hold (and it's a domain that never sends any email) Google caught similar attempts from 159.253.38.11 using that same domain. http://domainmail.org/dmarc-reports/google.com%21inug.org%211483401600%211483487999.xml > Because I notice the reason given > for the local policy override includes "Ignore dkim/spf DNS query" and > there's no DKIM section in <auth_results> - making me wonder if they had > a problem accessing your selector, and that the comment above really > means "our DNS query for a DKIM record received no response." > > Plausible? I don't see enough information to rule it out... Interesting, but they won't find a selector for that domain on my DNS systems as its not used for email. -Jim P. _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
