Hi - which part of please unsubscribe me last time didnt you understand!


On 17-01-19 15:00, [email protected] wrote:
Send dmarc-discuss mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of dmarc-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

    1. Re: A bit quiet? (Roland Turner)
    2. Re: A bit quiet? (Roland Turner)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 05:23:38 +0000
From: Roland Turner <[email protected]>
To: DMARC Discussion List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet?
Message-ID:
        
<he1pr0202mb258586f39accd222bf314294e6...@he1pr0202mb2585.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Brandon Long wrote:


If you go to p=quarantine and pct=0, Google Groups will still do the rewriting, 
but no one
should enforce the quarantine.  I know this is true for our own code, but I 
don't know how
well others handle it to know if it's a safe thing to do or not.
That is excellent and revolting at the same time! Thank you.

- Roland

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20170119/08b5e6d8/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 05:26:57 +0000
From: Roland Turner <[email protected]>
To: DMARC Discussion List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] A bit quiet?
Message-ID:
        
<he1pr0202mb2585e872f424a73fc9fce400e6...@he1pr0202mb2585.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

John Payne wrote:

That's awesome.  Do we have enough implementers on this list to gain any 
confidence on whether or not
p=quarantine and pct=0 would enforce quarantine or not?
It is a reasonably safe bet that pct=0 will prevent quarantining. (Any receiver 
observed doing otherwise will no doubt be promptly encouraged to stop doing 
so.) Whether other forwarders will rewrite in this case is an open question.

- Roland
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20170119/43a49667/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)


------------------------------

End of dmarc-discuss Digest, Vol 59, Issue 3
********************************************

_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to