On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:04:39PM +0100, Petr Novák via dmarc-discuss wrote: > Hello, > > > Return-Path: <[email protected]> > > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; > > spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of [email protected] > > designates X as permitted sender) [email protected]; > > dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=MD.se > > From: <[email protected]> > > your problem is that DMARC checks the policy against the domain in From > header. Which in your case is "From: <[email protected]>". That means > DMARC policy for MD.se is used, which was p=reject.
But we have SPF pass on the subdomain SD.MD.se, so shouldn't the SPF alignment between MD.se and SD.MD.se generate a pass in DMARC as well? Or is it the other way round with SPF alignment? I thought that alignment works both ways. > > I thought that subdomain emails should be allowed by sp=none in > > the DMARC policy for MD.se? > > Yep subdomains emails would be allowed with sp=none, if you used > subdomain in From header. for example (From: [email protected]) Thanks! Peter Olsson _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
