Er, that's 3/23, ie yesterday. On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Brandon Long <bl...@google.com> wrote:
> From our recent logs, it looks like it was updated from p=none to p=reject > on sometime around 2/23 1p PDT ... probably because of this note. > > Brandon > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:52 PM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss < > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > >> In article <caeo096q9wb0pbutsbtgyprb8g1qhd3xv5qqqo16xpre2zgl...@mail.gm >> ail.com> you write: >> > >> >One of our mailing list members, with a netscape.net email address, is >> >getting DMARC bounces. That domain is set to p=none. >> >> That hasn't been the case for quite a while. >> >> $ dig _dmarc.netscape.net txt >> >> ;; QUESTION SECTION: >> ;_dmarc.netscape.net. IN TXT >> >> ;; ANSWER SECTION: >> _dmarc.netscape.net. 60 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=reject; >> fo=1; pct=100; ri=3600; rua=mailto:a...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto: >> a...@ruf.agari.com" >> >> R's, >> John >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >> > >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
