Are you looking for the policy applied or the policy requested? Also, I would imagine this is heavily different depending on the receiver.
Brandon On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss < dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > Hi John, > > I'm looking for something simpler. A breakdown of how much mail was > p=reject,accept,quarantine.... > > 10% accept > 40% quarantine > > Make sense? > > Thanks, > 🐜 > > On Apr 24, 2017, at 17:12, John Wilson <jwil...@mail.agari.com> wrote: > > Anthony, > > Do you mean "versus local policy-overrides"? > > John > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Anthony Purcell via dmarc-discuss < > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I was wondering if any dmarc implementors had any stats on what >> percentage of your mail stream matches the various polices? Or if there is >> a maawg doc out there someone could point me to that would be great. >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >> > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
