On 10/25/2017 4:00 PM, John R Levine wrote:
We could do that but I don't see any reason to think that the people who
haven't read any of the other good advice would read it.
I did a quick scan of the two supporting docs we did:
RFC 5585 - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Service Overview
RFC 5863 - DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment
and Operations
and have concluded that they are just too long for this purpose. What's
needed is something far more concise, and tightly focused on explaining
the basic benefits and limits of DKIM. I'd hazard to call it a DKIM
Data Sheet, but one that is candid.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
