I've always been a little confused with the distinctions between the 'iodef' Incident Object Description Exchange Format or 'afrf' Authentication Failure Reporting Formats.
Obviously, afrf has become the defacto standard, as that's all I see in any DMARC record that I examine. I've reviewed https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5070 and am no closer to appreciating the impact of selecting one format over another. Is this an example where one standard as been publically accepted and the competing standards are more or less deprecated in deployment ? Thanks, Jack
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
