Would this really help?
You haven't explained what you mean by "a little hard to consume". On
the face of it, it's just an integer; a 1 is no easier to perform
arithmetic on than a 2,436. If what you mean is that it's difficult to
make meaningful comparison between the number that you send and the
number reported received then that's true of course, but that would
remain the case as you'd have no way to work out which of the counts in
the individual receiver reports included messages that had been
processed by mailing lists; you'd replace your 2,436 with an
indeterminate number between 1 and, say, 100.
- Roland
On 05/05/18 03:37, Scott Kitterman via dmarc-discuss wrote:
I participate in a lot of mailing lists many of which that have a large number
of subscribers. As a result, when I send a single message to a mailing list,
many copies of the same message get sent to users at large mail providers.
These get counted as individual messages in aggregate reporting.
As an example, I have been able to find four messages I sent to
lists.debian.org email lists on April 30th. The volume reported for that
source for that day from various feedback reporters was 2,436. This makes it
a little hard to consume the feedback.
Shouldn't it be possible to de-duplicate these based on message ID before
sending aggregate reports back? Can/should this be added to DMARC the next
time the specification is updated?
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
