On 03/01/2014 02:06 AM, J. Trent Adams wrote:
DMARC Folks -
As you know, the authors of the DMARC specification have been looking to
find a home for the base document somewhere within the IETF. We've
explored various options in the past year, and now it looks like we've
found the right path.
We have chosen to submit the DMARC specification via the Independent
Submission Editor (ISE). This will have three primary effects: (1) it
will be published with a permanent reference location; (2) it will be
classified as Informational rather than as a Proposed Standard; (3) the
ISE process is a much more direct path to publication.
A primary reason for this shift is that DMARC is already a mature
specification with broad adoption. We also want to help support its
continued deployment and provide a foundation for potential future
evolution. There are some related issues that still need to mature
further, such as reporting practices, domain boundary identification,
etc. To facilitate those work streams, it is important to publish a
referenceable version of the specification.
To support this effort, we are asking the community for input as we
prepare the current version for submission to the ISE. We are seeking
concise statements that can be incorporated into the specification
primarily with a focus toward clarity, readability, and utility. While
we're happy to continue cataloging suggestions for future work, our goal
is primarily to tighten up this version of the document. Please send
your comments to this IETF discussion list within the next week as we
intend to submit the final version of the specification to the ISE by
the close of the meeting in London.
Current Specification:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base/
What about the contributions made by Franck Martin [1], Tim Draegen [2]
and John Levine [3]? AFAICS these comments/suggestions have not yet been
incorporated in a new draft version -03, except maybe part of [3].
/rolf
[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/current/msg00683.html
[2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/current/msg00645.html
[3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/current/msg00584.html
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
