----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim Fenton" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 3:18:04 PM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Solution for DMARC disruption of normal email use > while still offering its normal > protection > > On 5/28/14 2:54 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > > On 5/28/2014 2:52 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> How do we define the scope of work for this list? > > > > Merely as an example, one line of effort could be towards methods of > > DKIM signature survival through mailing lists. > > > > It's not a new topic and it's not an easy one, and it doesn't even have > > the string D-M-A-R-C in it, but any real progress for this could be > > quite helpful in mitigating collateral damage with especially aggressive > > DMARC use. > > Since you don't mention it, what about the "mail this article to a > friend" use case that has also been mentioned? Is that a problem that > should be addressed here? > > I want to make sure that isn't forgotten just because it doesn't affect > IETF directly. > It should not be forgotten. There are also all the use cases on how you get third parties sending emails on your behalf to become compliant. There are so many options available.
The question, I have, is if the format of an RFC is the proper format to give implementation advice to "webmasters". Will they read it? or should it be a nice glossy email marketer style blog/white paper? _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
