On Monday, June 02, 2014 12:58:47 Brandon Long wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > Brandon Long writes: ... > > Mailman is already working on this. Unfortunately, some domains just > > use a generic 5.7.x policy bounce, and other don't even give you that > > much information. (We are guessing, but backtracking to the sender -- > > you don't always even get that information -- and correlating with > > other DMARC bounces, we're pretty sure that these are DMARC bounces.) > > We use 5.7.1, and in general we don't let 5.7.1 errors set users to > bouncing > (though, enough bounces will do so eventually). Its tricky, that's for > sure, but generally we > treat 5.7.1 as "we can't know whether or not these will ever succeed or its > something specific to this message")
FYI, There is a discussion about defining new codes for email authentication failures in progress on apps-discuss which may interest people interested in this particular topic. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-email-auth-codes/ (comments there not here and I suggest a review of the ML archives prior to posting comments) Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
