On 06/08/2014 08:41 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:32 PM, John C Klensin <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Murray, you didn't mention whether there is any ongoing > discussion in dmarc.org <http://dmarc.org> and, if so, how Hector > can participate > there. If there are no further discussions there and dmarc.org > <http://dmarc.org> > is turning change control over to the IETF, it might be helpful > for people here to know that. Conversely, if discussions on the > IETF dmarc list (or the IETF list) are simply taken as input to > a change control and decision process that is not described on > the dmarc.org <http://dmarc.org> web pages or in any other obvious > place, it would > be good to be explicit about that. > > > Hi John, > > There are two active venues for discussion about DMARC. This one is > the primary one. There is a legacy list operated at dmarc.org > <http://dmarc.org> that has more casual conversation not geared to > specification development and advancement.
Given that on this list there was no discussion of or response to the detailed review of the -04 draft that I sent on April 16, I came to the conclusion that specification development, if any is going on, is happening somewhere else. -Jim
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
