On 6/19/14, 5:46 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
So, are we going to create a new header field every time we come up with some new required semantic we want to attach to a DKIM signature?Admittedly this hasn't happened previously, but predicting the future has never been our strong suit. Why don't we fix the extensibility problem instead?
+1
Tony Hansen
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
