On 6/27/2014 3:55 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > it seems that there's a .co.uk domain name > used as an example in the charter text, that domain name is on a spam > block list, and that caused a high spam score.
What is especially frustrating is that it's a formally-legal/appropriate example name. > I've suggested that this represents a faulty spam rule: a blacklisted > domain name in an address field should cause a high spam score, but it > shouldn't do so when we're talking about the domain in the body of the > message. Lots of spam can be detected by virtue of specific URLs that occur in the body. So it's entirely reasonable that it was looking there. That said, yes, the ruleset for IETF mailing lists probably needs tweaking, given the unusual nature of our content, with respect to spam/anti-spam work. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
