Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-dmarc-00-00: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dmarc/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I think the intent here is that the base spec could be updated or obsoleted by the WG if there's a real need to do that. Given the history, it could be useful to find a way to say that that might happen, while still including the "seek to preserve" etc language which is good. But I'm ok with this as-is if such a change might re-open a rathole discussion. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
