On Aug 29, 2014, at 11:06 AM, Pete Resnick <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/29/14 12:35 PM, Tim Draegen wrote: >> On Aug 29, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Pete Resnick<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Tim/Ned [Ccing WG]: >>> >>> While I think the milestones that appear in the wiki are great for internal >>> WG management (and in fact I think you could even add more of them), I >>> think for the external-facing milestones on the charter page, you should >>> have the more common externally visible milestones like "initial draft of >>> X" or "submission of completed document Y to the IESG", etc. >>> >>> That work for you? >>> >> Yes it does. I'll rework the external-facing milestones to perhaps remove >> some confusion. >> > > Are you OK with the following edits? > > Dec 2014 Complete draft on DMARC interop issues + possible methods to > address > Mar 2015 Complete draft on DMARC improvements to better support indirect > email flows > May 2015 Complete draft on DMARC Usage Guide > May 2015 Complete draft on changes to DMARC base spec Dear Pete, The charter statement indicates work on a public suffix concept is out-of-scope. This is fine provided the definition used in the charter is retained: "An organizational domain is the 'base' name that is allocated from a public registry;" With the "root" of domains being the top-most element, an organizational domain therefore exists immediately below that of the registry (or that of the registrar's domain). Any other arrangement would create an unmanageable situation. Those playing the role of registering or as registrar is determined by assigned international organizations managing these functions. While some may insist they should be able to offer some role of registrar to establish higher granularity for organizational domains, only those so authorized as a registrar can be recognized as playing that role. This means only the defined organizational domain is able to subsequently increased granularity below their domain by way of their policy assertions. Such policy assertions should be a matter handled within the WG as related to organizational domain policy. Regards, Douglas Otis
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
