On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Messages for which SPF and/or DKIM evaluation encounters a temporary
> DNS error have not received a definitive result for steps 3 and/or 4
> above.
> If the message has not passed the the DMARC mechanism check due to
> an SPF or DKIM check that did not have a DNS error, receivers can either
> ignore DMARC for this message due to incomplete evaluation or they
> can defer the message in the hope that the temporary error will be
> resolved when the message is retried. Receivers MUST NOT apply DMARC
> policy and reject or quarantine the message because the DMARC
> evaluation is incomplete. When otherwise appropriate due to DMARC
> policy, receivers MAY send feedback reports regarding temporary errors.
>
> Handling of messages for which SPF and/or DKIM evaluation encounters
> a permanent DNS error is left to the discretion of the Mail Receiver.
>
> How's that?
>
I think it pretty much says what's there, but is a lot more clear about
it. I also think the second sentence is a bit convoluted, so I reworked it
into this. Does it match what you're trying to say?
<t> Messages for which SPF and/or DKIM evaluation encounters
a temporary DNS error have not received a definitive
result for steps 3 and/or 4 above. When such an
evaluation
is done in conjunction with an aligned identifier,
completion of the DMARC algorithm is not possible.
In this case, receivers can either skip DMARC for this
message due to incomplete evaluation, or they can
arrange
to defer handling of the message in the hope that the
temporary error will be resolved when the message is
retried. In any case, Receivers cannot apply DMARC
policy and reject or quarantine the message because the
DMARC evaluation is incomplete. When otherwise
appropriate due to DMARC policy, receivers MAY send
feedback reports regarding temporary errors. </t>
-MSK
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
