It really is time to put the non-IETF version to bed and hand it off, even with its weaknesses, and let the standards process take it from there. There's a working group already chartered to do exactly that; in fact, that was one of the premises of creating that working group.
I was under the impression that the reason this version's going through the ISE is that the DMARC group isn't willing to hand change control to the IETF. If they are willing, it makes no sense to do it outside of a WG.
I sympathize with your concern about the length of the process, and the lack of timely review, but DMARC is unusually complex for a mail thing, the implementations have all been from different drafts (did anyone ever do reporting by http?) and it's not surprising that there are still places where the code doesn't match the text, or two versions of code do different things.
Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
