> And third (the killer) the > recipients aren't going to recognize the new address, and so it's > going to look as suspicious as the stupid Outlook-style headers.
What's "stupid" about Outlook style headers? How should it look? -- Terry -----Original Message----- From: dmarc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen J. Turnbull Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 9:42 AM To: John Levine Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sending email on behalf of? John Levine writes: > > From: "John Doe ([email protected]) via NPO" <[email protected]> > > I would try some tests particularly at AOL before I did that. AOL > mail tends to reject anything that looks like a munged AOL address. > > The least painful approach may be to tell people with AOL addresses, > sorry, please get a different address. Oh, boy, oh, boy, am I glad I *can* tell my users to get another address or suffer. But I don't see how the OP can. First of all, they aren't his users, they are his client's users. Second of all, I can't imagine the client telling *its* donors they have to get a new address to recommend donation to friends and family. And third (the killer) the recipients aren't going to recognize the new address, and so it's going to look as suspicious as the stupid Outlook-style headers. Brother-I-feel-your-pain-ly y'rs, Steve _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
