On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, John Bucy <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on a quick glance, it doesn't look like > draft-kucherawy-dkim-list-canon-00 addresses encoded headers like rfc2047. > An mta could opt to send a message with unencoded utf8 headers (display > name, subject, etc) to another peer advertising SMTPUTF8 even if none of > the envelope were internationalized addresses. If the recipient then needed > to relay the message on to a site that didn't support SMTPUTF8, it would > have to encode the headers. >
You're right, it doesn't. It's only meant to address body modifications that lists might do. In fact it is specifically a body canonicalization. I hadn't done any work on list-sensitive header canonicalization yet. Do you have a suggestion in mind? -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
