On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 05:00:43 AM Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Scott Kitterman writes: > > From: "$CUSTOMER_FRIENDLY_NAME" <[email protected]> > > To: $DELIVERY_ADDRESS > > Reply-To: "$CUSTOMER_FRIENDLY_NAME" <$CUSTOMER_ADDRESS> > > This won't work for a lot of mailing lists, though, because Reply-To > is munged to point to the list, and it is frequently a requirement of > such lists that $CUSTOMER_ADDRESS *not* be in Reply-To. > > And although it gets the mail past DMARC, ISTR that in many cases (eg, > invoicing services) the client (ie, the billing firm) wants its > address in From, so it flunks the user requirements here, too. > > I suspect that if this becomes common, it will play havoc with > recipient contact lists, too. > > > but it works for DMARC: > Sure, but that's the tail wagging the dog. The point of DMARC is so > that people can put their addresses in From and be believed, not that > there are kludges to get your content past DMARC.
I know this isn't any kind of solution for mailing lists. It is something in use that works (FSVO works) for third party origination. Presentation differs among MUAs, so it's hard to draw generalizations about how well that set of identities are presented to end users. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
