On 4/1/2015 8:03 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> In the latter case, it's really an entirely new protocol, which should
> be identified by the next-lower protocol, rather than by using the
> version field as an in-bred demultiplexing field.
...
> I can't get my head around the "entirely new" part of that assertion though.
Absolutely trivial idea:
If two networking implementations are properly conforming to mature
and debugged specifications, but the implementations cannot
interoperate, then the specifications are for different protocols.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
