On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 01:04:34 AM Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Scott Kitterman writes: > > 8 bit to 7 bit transformations are also not rare. > > In the header? I guess with RFC 6532 that could happen frequently > (but those folks are likely to be in trouble with DKIM anyway for the > foreseeable future).
Yeah, I forgot what parts of the message we were talking about. Scott K > > > Really, isn't the question whether Yahoo! and AOL are willing to do > > > *anything* to mitigate? We need some participation from them or it's > > > useless, and if at least one does participate, it's a win. What are > > > they willing to think about implementing? > > > > Depends on who needs to change to mitigate things. > > To implement any of the "weak signature" variants (see subject), the > From domain has to be involved as sender. That's why I'm asking. > > > If (as an example only) we decide that From rewriting is the best > > (least bad) solution, > > That's not what this thread is about, and it obviously doesn't need > participation from them. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
