Hi, Hector,

> For the umpteenth time, not everyone need 4000 domains. Most of the 
> domains that will or may utilize it, simply don't need this scale.

I'm not sure you get the point that the others are trying to make. While this 
*may* scale for small domains (a big maybe), it won't scale for large domains 
like Hotmail, Yahoo, Google, AOL, and a lot of other large providers who are 
unlikely to implement it. They make up a small number of implementers but a 
massive number of users. If it won't work for this massive user base, then it's 
not worth implementing even on a small scale because for the average user (of 
which there are millions), the people they try to send to (Hotmail, Google, 
Yahoo) aren't supporting this.

-- Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: dmarc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hector Santos
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 5:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publishing and Registration Concerns

On 4/15/2015 4:39 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> For the umpteenth time, the issue isn't managing a DNS zone.  That's the easy
> part.  The hard part is knowing what to put in it.

Right. I never said it was hard problem.  This didn't stop the large 
domain with SPF in adding INCLUDE and still have an unknown result.

>Many companies, not even
> the really big ones, have thousands of domains.

and millions more does not.

> Go publish SPF, DKIM key, and  DMARC records for 4,000 domains and then tell 
> me
> it's all easy to then figure out what the right list of authorized forwarders
>should be for each one.

For the umpteenth time, not everyone need 4000 domains. Most of the 
domains that will or may utilize it, simply don't need this scale.

> P.S.  I'm done on the topic of is keeping a list of forwarders a useful
> solution for the group to work on.  No matter how you wrap it up, it's not.

So move on, scott.

-- 
HLS


_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to