On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:10 AM [GMT+1=CET], Douglas Otis wrote: > Dear WG, > > A draft has been posted offering two alternatives not > requiring cooperation of disruptive ESPs. > (...snip...) > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dmarc-escape-00
I have dificulty parsing this paragraph: "[DMARC] section 10.5 offers feeble advice by stating although mediator transformations may conform with standards, this may not avoid message Reject or Quarantine handling nor does it allow provisions for alignment with verified Sender header fields likely preferable to diverted placement of valid and legitimate messages." I can, more or less, understand it, reading it like this (<blah> are additions I make to try to understand it): "[DMARC] section 10.5 offers feeble advice by stating <that> although mediator transformations may conform with standards, this <-strike previous word-; they> may not avoid message Reject or Quarantine handling nor does it <-strike previous 2 words-; do them> allow provisions for alignment with verified Sender header fields <, which is> likely preferable to diverted placement of valid and legitimate messages." Or something. Regards, J.Gomez _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
