----- Original Message ----- > From: "Franck Martin" <[email protected]> > To: "R E Sonneveld" <[email protected]> > > I believe a number of the Mediators, described in par. 3.2 of > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-01, cannot > > easily be changed. To give an example: recently when I was working for > > company A, I forwarded an invitation I got from company B to one of my > > addresses at ESP C. I just used the Exchange/Outlook forward function at > > company A and discovered that the mail client I used at ESP C showed the > > address of company B, no the address I have with company A. Company A is > > using Exchange/Outlook 2010 and has no plans to upgrade for the next > > couple of years. Should Microsoft update Exchange to support some > > mediator 'change' for DMARC, then this probably won't be 'retrofitted' > > into Exchange 2010. So it may take many years before I can use a version > > that supports DMARC 'mediation'. > > > Personally, I consider this a bug, because it looks like to C that B invited > him/her, while it was A that did. > > This bug is on the wiki, but it falls under the "Message Forwarding" section, > not sure we need to spell it out there, but it is not uncommon. > Correction it is described in the draft and still is...
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
