On 29 Apr 2015 09:11:57 EDT, "John R Levine" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm still hoping for something that users will like, so I guess it's back > > to the drawing board. > > The usual next step is to write up the proposal as an I-D and send it in, > so we have a concrete description. Even if we decide not to use it, > having a spec to refer to is often useful when looking at future > proposals. Right. I'd been avoiding that because I saw this as a relatively minor change to Murray's draft-kucherawy-dkim-transform-00, but if message wrapping is considered a nonstarter, a new I-D is in order, assuming that there's a simple, secure, and palatable way to divide any arbitrary message body into its "original Author part" and "list decoration part(s)", irrespective of the Author's part being good-ol' text or MIME. MJA _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
