----- Original Message ----- > From: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <[email protected]> > To: "Franck Martin" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:47:20 PM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] New Version Notification for > draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-02.txt > > 2. Causes of Interoperability Issues > > This section focuses on intended recipient perspective but fails to > mention/discuss the originator perspective where some subset of originators, > particularly for high value transactional messages, want the message > discarded if it passes through an intermediary and is modified in any way > resulting in a failure to validate. Examples of such messages include those > related to financial organizations and medical establishments.
Good point. added this section, may be you have better language: 2.1. Originator vs Receiver Perspective Some Receivers are concerned that wanted email messages are received, regardless if such email messages are not strictly in conformance to any standard or protocol. Some Originators, particularly for high value transactional messages, want the message discarded if it passes through an intermediary and is modified in any way resulting in a failure to validate. Examples of such messages include those related to financial organizations and medical establishments. > > 2.1 (This is just a nit) Last paragraph > > SPF can provides two Authenticated Identifiers... > > This should be "SPF can provide two Authenticated Identifiers..." > fixed _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
