Hmm, okay. I need to think through what I wrote a little more, then. I think I misunderstood somewhat your proposal.
-- Terry -----Original Message----- From: dmarc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John R Levine Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 1:24 PM To: Terry Zink Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] OpenDKIM ADSP, DMARC and ATPS support > John’s proposal changes DKIM but also requires additional changes in > DMARC to respect the changes that were made to DKIM when doing alignment > (the @fs=domain is more or less the same as the Original-To below). ... It's not supposed to. The decision about whether a DKIM signature that depends on a chained signature is valid is supposed to happen entirely within the updated DKIM module. DMARC just uses that result. I assume the DKIM module is able to look at all of the DKIM signatures on a message and report back which ones are valid. Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
